Understanding Adult Industry Censorship on Social Media Platforms Like Instagram

Social media marketing presents a significant problem for the adult entertainment sector. The only popular social media network that allows some degree of adult content is Twitter. Because of this, producers, performers, and adult platforms frequently share uncensored content on Twitter. However, with worries about Elon Musk and shadow banning, that is gradually changing.

Adult Business Consulting discusses this issue below.

Pornhub and Instagram

Pornhub.com, a website for streaming adult videos, was banned by Instagram, which is owned by Meta. The official account for Mark Zuckerberg’s photo-sharing website was reinstated following public protest and criticism. In just a few hours, Instagram deleted their account.

In a statement, Pornhub criticized what they referred to as arbitrary censorship. According to a representative for Pornhub, “Meta has demonstrated that its policies have no rhyme or reason when they deactivated our account again, despite not violating any rules,” according to a statement to Variety. The representative continued, “This comes at a time when there is rising censorship and discrimination against performers in the adult market, when platforms like Instagram should be inclusive and offer safe spaces for creators to express themselves…We demand that [Meta Platforms] reconsider its choice.

Is Instagram Right to Act in This Way?

Does Instagram have the authority to block a profile from an adult website? The quick response is “yes.” This is why. Instagram, like many other social media sites, has community rules designed to create a welcoming and safe space for all users. One of these rules forbids the transmission of what the business considers to be sexually explicit material, such as consensual adult pornography.

Instagram banned Pornhub on the grounds that it was filtering content on all its platforms. First and foremost, the age range of Instagram users must be considered. Millions of Instagram users who are under the age of 18 are among them. Instagram has a duty as a platform to protect its users from potentially harmful and objectionable information, including children. Second, it is alleged that pornography contributes to the objectification and exploitation of people, particularly women.

Trust and safety experts, who frequently investigate and remove information from web platforms, frequently have to make decisions based on their own experiences and perceptions of different cultures. However, this introduces inconsistency throughout the ecosystem of the platform. However, pornography on Instagram may result in unfavorable media coverage and possible negative outcomes, including financial effects such as lost users and income. In order to respect its community standards and safeguard users from potentially harmful and inappropriate content that is age-restricted, Instagram censors pornography.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996

Online platforms and service providers in the United States are legally protected for content submitted by third party users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.

The legislation was passed as a component of the Telecommunications Act as a whole. The law was considered as one of the most significant pieces of internet legislation in the United States. The CDA stipulates in Section 230 that “no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”

This means that if they operate in good faith to remove or restrict access to unlawful or objectionable content, online platforms like social media sites, forums, and review websites are not liable for the content posted by their users. The law has been credited with encouraging online free speech and fostering the development of the internet. Companies can now monitor material without worrying about facing legal repercussions for what users write. However, there has been more discussion recently about whether Section 230 should be changed or eliminated, especially considering worries about the dissemination of false information and hate speech on social networking sites.

Section 230 and Instagram

According to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, Instagram is exempt from liability for the posts and other conduct of third-party users on its platform since it provides an interactive computer service. In this situation, Instagram can argue that it is operating legally in enforcing rules that virtually forbid some people and organizations from using their platform. However, Pornhub did not violate any of the terms of service guidelines that permit third parties to use Instagram’s platform.

Things Aren’t Crystal Clear

The motivation for shadowbanning on websites like Instagram and Twitter is instead thought to be related to anti-pornography initiatives in the United States and Europe. Some of these organizations, such as the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, Exodus Cry, and #TraffickingHub, which opposes sexual speech, have collaborated to report, and demand venues to do so. This is true for what is taking place on a website like Instagram.

Even if Pornhub isn’t specifically in violation of the rules and regulations, the controversy surrounding the removal of adult content from popular social networking platforms is a big bone of disagreement between tech and adult content.

In addition to disabling a second account that Pornhub attempted to create after the permanent ban, Meta claimed that Pornhub violated its rule on “sexual solicitation” for more than ten years. Instagram has a nebulous definition of what they mean by “sexual solicitation.” Meta has been “borrowed from archaic anti-sex work laws and imprecisely adapted to the online space by terms of service drafters – has been very sharply criticized by the company’s own Oversight Board,” according to Gustavo Turner, the news editor for XBIZ, in a previous report. According to Turner, the Oversight Board said that Meta’s platform should right away “clarify its public-facing sexual solicitation policy and narrow its internal enforcement guidance.” Additionally, it is unlikely that this will occur very soon.

Adult Business Consulting is monitoring this issue because it directly impacts adult industry clients.

Read more from the Adult Business Consulting blog.

Adult Business Consulting thanks you for reading this blog post. Please get in touch with us if you have any questions.


Lets Talk

Please fill out the following form if you're interested in getting in touch with a member of our team.

Your Name(Required)
Your Email Address(Required)
Please include your country code.
The URI of the contact form location when submitted
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.